Search results for "Testing protocols"

showing 3 items of 3 documents

Two New Alternatives to the Conventional Arm-in-Cage Test for Assessing Topical Repellents

2021

Abstract European guidelines for testing attractant and repellent efficacy (i.e., Product type 19 [PT19]) have been in revision since 2017. A key topic of discussion is the current approach to evaluating topical repellents. The European Chemical Agency has stated field testing should be avoided because of mosquito-borne disease risks. However, the most common laboratory method, the arm-in-cage (AIC) test, may limit the reliable extrapolation of lab results to field conditions. This study’s main goal was to assess alternative laboratory methods for evaluating topical mosquito repellents that use mosquito landing rates more representative of those in the field. The study took place at three E…

AcademicSubjects/SCI01382Aedes albopictus030231 tropical medicineDEETToxicology03 medical and health sciencesroom test0302 clinical medicineTesting protocolsAedesVector Control Pest Management Resistance RepellentsAnimalsHumansAcademicSubjects/MED00860030304 developmental biology0303 health sciencesLaboratory methodsGeneral Veterinarybiologylanding rateAedes albopictusbiology.organism_classificationTest (assessment)testing protocolsInfectious DiseasesbioassayInsect RepellentsInsect ScienceBiological AssayParasitologyField conditionsJournal of Medical Entomology
researchProduct

Improving Biological Dyes and Stains: Quality Testing Versus Standardization

1994

This paper discusses the impact of both standardization and quality testing of dyes and stains in biology and medicine. After the brief review of why standardized dyes and strains are not presently available commercially, two types of testing and ways of improving dye quality are described. National or international organizations could be established to define standardization of dyes and stains. Standardization would be specifically defined as a list of physico-chemical parameters such as elaborated in this paper. Commercial batches of comparable quality may be labeled by the supplier as "standard dye," a procedure currently performed by the European Council for Clinical and Laboratory Stan…

Quality ControlHistologyStaining and LabelingStandardizationHistocytochemistrybusiness.industrymedia_common.quotation_subjectColoring agentsGeneral MedicineCertificationManufacturing engineeringEuropeMedical Laboratory TechnologyBiological stainTesting protocolsHumansMedicineQuality (business)Coloring AgentsDye testingbusinessmedia_commonBiotechnic & Histochemistry
researchProduct

Comparison of inter-trial recovery times for the determination of critical power and W' in cycling

2017

Critical Power (CP) and W’ are often determined using multi-day testing protocols. To investigate this cumbersome testing method, the purpose of this study was to compare the differences between the conventional use of a 24-h inter-trial recovery time with those of 3 h and 30 min for the determination of CP and W’. Methods: 9 moderately trained cyclists performed an incremental test to exhaustion to establish the power output associated with the maximum oxygen uptake (p V O2max), and 3 protocols requiring time-to-exhaustion trials at a constant work-rate performed at 80%, 100% and 105% of p VO2max. Design: Protocol A utilised 24-h inter-trial recovery (CP24/W’24), protocol B utilised 3-h in…

validityTime FactorsTime Factorpower-duration relationshipPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationAthletic Performance030204 cardiovascular system & hematology03 medical and health sciencesRecovery periodOxygen Consumption0302 clinical medicineAnimal scienceTesting protocolsHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicinePower outputSimulationMathematicsexercise testingLimits of agreementVO2 max030229 sport sciencesQPIncremental testBicyclinganaerobic work capacityCritical intensityMuscle FatigueCritical powerExercise TestCyclingGVHuman
researchProduct